Which of the following is NOT a way to provide advance notice of statutory lien rights to members?

The reasoning behind identifying personal notification during meetings as not a standard way to provide advance notice of statutory lien rights relates to the formal requirements for notification. Statutory lien rights often necessitate documented proof that consumers have been made aware of these rights well in advance of the creation of the lien.

Account opening documents and loan documents are typically part of the official paperwork where these rights can be explicitly included, ensuring that members have clear written evidence of their rights and obligations. Similarly, providing this information via email establishes a documented communication channel that retains proof of receipt.

In contrast, personal notifications during meetings may lack the necessary documentation to confirm that members have received the information, potentially leading to misunderstandings or disputes about whether the notice was given. This method of notification does not provide a reliable record, which is why it is less favored compared to more formal written methods.